Browse Items (53 total)
Sort by:
Leaflet : Woman suffrage not demanded : the petition for it not honestly signed and not representative. March 14, 1896. [Circa 1896-1900]
Letter to the editor of the New York times by author identified only as "A.P.P." The author accuses New York suffragists are misrepresenting the number of signatures gathered on petitions in favor of women's suffrage. He or she also argues that…
Leaflet : Woman suffrage and wages : will the ballot help women more than it does men. March 7, 1896. [Circa 1896-1900]
Letter to the editor of the New York times by author identified only as "E.S.C." The author makes the claim that women's wages and working conditions will not necessarily improve if they are granted the vote.
The letter was reprinted by the Albany…
The letter was reprinted by the Albany…
Leaflet : Woman suffrage / by Goldwin Smith. 1894
Reprinted from his "Essays on Questions of the Day," British historian and journalist, Goldwin Smith, argues against woman suffrage.
Stamp on back reads: "Apply for more papers to [Women's] Anti-Suffrage Association [of the Third Judicial District…
Stamp on back reads: "Apply for more papers to [Women's] Anti-Suffrage Association [of the Third Judicial District…
Leaflet : Woman suffrage : one of the grievances of the leading advocates therof. June 4, 1897. [Circa 1897-1900]
Reprint of an article from the Morning Enquirer of Buffalo, New York, in which the author discusses the fact that suffrage leaders are frustrated by the lack of support from noted literary women, including Gail Hamilton, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and…
Leaflet : Woman has many advantages : what she would lose should her demand for equal rights be granted : to the editor of the New York times. March 28, 1896. [Circa 1896-1900]
Letter to the editor of the New York Times by author identified only as "A.P.P." The author argues that if women are granted equal rights, they may lose many of the rights they have already gained, including property, guardianship of children,…
Leaflet : Why suffrage would not help women : 'E.S.C.' thinks those taxpayers would be worse off than now. February 29, 1896. [Circa 1896-1900]
Letter to the editor of the New York times by author identified only as "E.S.C." The author attempts to refute the suffragists' argument that taxation without representation is unjust.
The letter was reprinted by the Albany Anti-Suffrage…
The letter was reprinted by the Albany Anti-Suffrage…
Leaflet : What good will suffrage do them? Committee on protest against women suffrage. [Circa 1896-1900]
Article written published by the Committee on Protest against Woman Suffrage of the Women's Anti-Suffrage Association of the Third Judicial District of the State of New York, argues that women will not necessarily be better off if they are granted…
Leaflet : Was unjustly quoted : President Eliot of Harvard University writes a letter… October 14, 1896. [Circa 1896-1900]
Letter from Charles W. Eliot, president of Harvard University, written to Bishop William Croswell Doane, of Albany, New York, reprinted for distribution by the Albany Anti-Suffrage Association.
Eliot objects to the use of a quutation from an…
Eliot objects to the use of a quutation from an…
Leaflet : Views on woman suffrage : reasons given by three eminent persons why women should not vote. [Circa 1898-1899]
Opinions and quotes opposed to woman suffrage by philosopher, Herbert Spencer, Bishop John Heyl Vincent, the co-founder of the Chautauqua Institution; and Quaker and statesman, John Bright.
Leaflet : Translated. Extracts from "Revue des deux Mondes," August, 1896." "L'Australie et la Nouvell-Zelande." "Les experiences sociales-Le feminisme"-par M. Pierre Le Roy Beaulieu. [Circa 1898-1900]
Extracts from an article written by M. Pierre Leroy-Beaulieu from the Revue des deux Mondes, a French literary and cultural affairs magazine, translated as "Australia and New Zealand. Social Experiences-Feminism"